top of page

Antisemitic Blood libels generates a comfortable salary

The Antisemitic myths that Israel is an apartheid state, that Jews stole an Arab “Palestine”, that Jews are colonialist occupiers, that Israel kill millions of babies or imprison innocent kids whom are terrorists and terror suspects, generate a nice comfortable living for the heads of these organisations where billions monetarily are given to NGOs.

This is what we call a "blood libel". However. more than this, it is a well played out dangerous path which is supported by Jewish and non Jewish organisations alike.


Over 30 billion pounds have sifted through accounts of left wing Anti-Israel NGOs by philanthropists and donations in the past decade in the United Kingdom.


In the same vein as these "Turnspeak" techniques, have been based on falsehoods.

the Arab League makes use of a cognitive technique of propaganda called "turnspeak", where you attack someone and then turn it around 180 degrees and claim they attacked you. Because the truth is the exact opposite of the information being disseminated it is psychologically difficult to counter and leads to confusion.

Turnspeak leads to psychological confusion and a feeling of being "burned-out" or "overwhelmed" with too much information, effectively creating a blanket of "white noise" which makes clarity difficult to achieve.




In a sense, the Antisemitic charges are now channeled into anti-Zionist tours. These vicious lies and falsehoods about Israel has been an attempt to erode Israel’s moral religious and ethnic foundation.

The social media and well funded power by pro-Palestinian groups and left wing organisations with so called Zionist groups are masking these lies, hijacking the narrative of peace, justice and human rights when in reality they yearn for Israel's destruction.


Moreover, we have now witnessed groups—predominately on the political left—adopting the Palestinian cause as their own under the guise of “intersectionality,” a term coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in the 1980s to highlight the dual oppressions faced by black women—sexism and racism—and the feminist and anti-racism movements that failed to fully represent and advocate for them. currently, it has become a slogan under which minority groups join to fight what critics see as unrelated battles, but what activists see as iterations of the same struggle for justice.

As it is clearly articulated by the Black-Palestinian solidarity statements, they churn out mistruths and libels.

“Palestinian liberation represents an inherent threat to Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid, an apparatus built and sustained on ethnic cleansing, land theft, and the denial of Palestinian humanity and sovereignty.

While we acknowledge that the apartheid configuration in Israel/Palestine is unique from the United States (and South Africa), we continue to see connections between the situation of Palestinians and Black people.

“Israel’s widespread use of detention and imprisonment against Palestinians evokes the mass incarceration of Black people in the US, including the political imprisonment of our own revolutionaries. Soldiers, police, and courts justify lethal force against us and our children who pose no imminent threat. And while the US and Israel would continue to oppress us without collaborating with each other, we have witnessed police and soldiers from the two countries train side-by-side.”


All and all, the boycott has limited economic impact. As for the D in divestment, the long-term effect is not measurable as of yet but poses a risk of setting the exact state of mind that allowed the Damascus Affair to be accepted at face value in Europe. Indeed, when an interest group places demands to the Mayor of Atlanta to “divest” the police budget for other priorities, it is fairly clear which

https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4873529,00.html terminology inspired this demand. And that D for divestment is then followed by the B in boycott -BDS.



Focusing on one organisation "B'tselem", who recently came into the UK, piggybacked upon a British well funded NGO YachadUK disgracefully connected under the umbrella of the Jewish organisation the "British Board of Jewish Deputies", (see video below) are allowing these blood libels and defiling the IHRA definition of Antisemitism without consequence.



Below a representative admits YachadUK work alongside the British Board of Jewish Deputies

Wednesday 7/12/2022





The distortion by human-rights groups that Israelis murder innocent Arabs or Palestinians amounts to nothing more than a blood libel. This pandemic is a modern-day example of how disease going back to the Black Death in Europe and the Near East—beginning in 1346, when Jews were first accused of poisoning the wells—have been used to promote hatred against the Jewish people.


It is high time the British Jewish leadership

stood up and called out these organisations and what is happening by distancing themselves from what is clearly the enemy within.



Comentarios


Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Search By Tags
Archive
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
bottom of page